<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NiteRider Rebel - On Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanvelo.org/niterider-rebel-on-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanvelo.org/niterider-rebel-on-test/</link>
	<description>Bicycles in the urban environment. A magazine about urban cycling.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: iconoclasst</title>
		<link>http://urbanvelo.org/niterider-rebel-on-test/#comment-2834</link>
		<dc:creator>iconoclasst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanvelo.org/?p=1232#comment-2834</guid>
		<description>Just "won" the 2.0 version at Big Bear (2nd place prize, SS/Rigid class) and I threw it on my prissy fixie, since there's no cord to ruin the esthetics.  

I like the fact that it mount to the stem, thereby leaving the bar unadorned in classic FG style.  I also like the "tool-less" mounting system, although the fork component requires zip-ties and thus cannot be removed easily.

One immediate downside that NR seems to have dropped the ball on is the display.  Yes, the numbers appear large, but the descriptor abbreviations (e.g. DST for distance) are so tiny as to make the numerical data meaningless.  You see numbers, but without a little bit of thinking, it's difficult to know what they mean right away.

Also, for the congenitally nerdy, the distance feature only measures to tenths of a mile, not hundredths (yeah, I know, WTF cares?).

I agree that the elastic moutning system will prove the achilles heel here; elastics have a poor track record for longevity, especially when exposed to the elements.

Lastly, as far as I can tell (and, admittedly, it's still new to me), there's no "distance 2" feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just &#8220;won&#8221; the 2.0 version at Big Bear (2nd place prize, SS/Rigid class) and I threw it on my prissy fixie, since there&#8217;s no cord to ruin the esthetics.  </p>
<p>I like the fact that it mount to the stem, thereby leaving the bar unadorned in classic FG style.  I also like the &#8220;tool-less&#8221; mounting system, although the fork component requires zip-ties and thus cannot be removed easily.</p>
<p>One immediate downside that NR seems to have dropped the ball on is the display.  Yes, the numbers appear large, but the descriptor abbreviations (e.g. DST for distance) are so tiny as to make the numerical data meaningless.  You see numbers, but without a little bit of thinking, it&#8217;s difficult to know what they mean right away.</p>
<p>Also, for the congenitally nerdy, the distance feature only measures to tenths of a mile, not hundredths (yeah, I know, WTF cares?).</p>
<p>I agree that the elastic moutning system will prove the achilles heel here; elastics have a poor track record for longevity, especially when exposed to the elements.</p>
<p>Lastly, as far as I can tell (and, admittedly, it&#8217;s still new to me), there&#8217;s no &#8220;distance 2&#8243; feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Jeff</title>
		<link>http://urbanvelo.org/niterider-rebel-on-test/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 04:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanvelo.org/?p=1232#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected on the backlight feature being exclusive to NiteRider (the review is now updated to reflect that). Thanks for the heads up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected on the backlight feature being exclusive to NiteRider (the review is now updated to reflect that). Thanks for the heads up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcola</title>
		<link>http://urbanvelo.org/niterider-rebel-on-test/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>pcola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanvelo.org/?p=1232#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>well, i believe that Trek already has a back lit light out and cat eye might as well.  just sayin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, i believe that Trek already has a back lit light out and cat eye might as well.  just sayin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bicycle Mark</title>
		<link>http://urbanvelo.org/niterider-rebel-on-test/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>Bicycle Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanvelo.org/?p=1232#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>The first Panoram bike-puter (the wide one) has backlighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first Panoram bike-puter (the wide one) has backlighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
